Hand to Hand Combat: Vladimir “Beyne” Geshkenbein

Vladimir Geshkenbein recently got the attention of the poker world for his performance at the European Poker Tour Snowfest. Geshkenbein snowballed his way over 481 opponents to reach the €390,000 first prize. In this special edition of Hand 2 Hand Combat, the Russian discusses two key hands from the event, and Card Player Europe also asks his opponents their thoughts on the hands in question.
Hand No. 1:
Vladimir Geshkenbein: Overall on day one I had a pretty nice table. It was a couple of hours into the game (but we were still deep because of the good EPT structure). I had about 120 big blinds. My image was pretty crazy, I had been opening a lot and barrelling a lot, so I was considered a bluff-monkey. So I get jacks under the gun 2 and raise ‘em up!
Now the action folds to Jan Heitmann, he is sitting on the button. He is a very good German player and knows me pretty well. He was commentating on the German High Roller show, so he knows a lot about my game. He was kind of aggressive though, I noticed him three-bet bluffing a few times and trying to float/outplay other people. I haven’t been involved much with him yet. So the action goes back to him and after a few seconds he announces raise and puts out a three-bet.
Now I had a difficult decision: Obviously folding was out of the question, but should I call and see a flop this deep or should I four-bet and get it in? The problem here is that if I call the three-bet I am going to be out of position against an aggressive opponent. I will have to fold a lot of flops, and on the good flops (for example 10-high), I will still have to call at least two streets and put in more than half of my stack. So if he has Q-Q I’m still going to lose a big part of my stack.
Now the second option was to four-bet and get it in. I chose the more aggressive route and four-bet to my usual size (about 2.8x his raise). After going into the tank for about a minute he announces “all-in”. I was not happy about that, but because I had already made my decision to four-bet get it in before, I sighed and called. He asked, “Kings?” And was pretty surprised to see me turn over just pocket jacks (considering we were both over 100 BB’s deep). Sheepishly he turned over 6♠ 4♠ for a complete bluff and was crushed by my jacks.
Jan Heitmann’s thoughts on the hand:
Basically, I knew Vladimir a little bit from commentating on the German High Rollers where he played very loose and aggressive, bluffing a lot and getting involved with a lot of speculative hands.
At the EPT Snowfest table, he was quite active and had raised the last four hands consecutively, giving up 3/4 versus a three-bet. So I figured, it was a good time to three-bet his open-raise with 6♠ 4♠ in position. Once he four-bet, I thought he was likely to fight back at some time, given he had to give up so many times versus a three-bet in this orbit. I figured he might four-bet light and give up anything but his monsters.
I still had a nice stack, threatening almost his entire stack, so my fold equity was high versus all but his best hands. I five-bet-jammed and he called with jacks. In my opinion, the call with J-J is marginal if he does not think I am bluffing a lot in that spot. (I was playing my normal tight aggressive style up till then, not spewing any chips, I think.) Versus my five-bet-jamming range (AK+, QQ+) he only has around 35 percent equity.
However, thinking about the meta-game and having given up so many pots in the past at this table, he must call the push with J-J if he decides to four-bet in the first place. He also might have picked up a tell that I wasn’t strong.
All-in-all, I was semi-happy with the play. Obviously, it feels a lot better, if it works (or if I suck out). Maybe the spot was not quite as good as I thought at the time.
But that is the beauty about poker — You learn something every time you play, and some answers still elude you.
Hand No.2:
Vladimir Geshkenbein: We are down to fourhanded. Blinds are 30,000-60,000. [Kevin] Vandersmissen and I are both big stacks, and two other guys are pretty short. So obviously I try to stay out of the way of Vandersmissen and try to knock out the short stacks. But I can’t stay out of the way when I get A♠ 10♠ on the button. So I do my usual raise to 130,000 and Vandersmissen, out of the big blind, comes back with the three-bet to 290,000. Now he is a very aggressive player and knows I don’t want to bust at this stage, as there are still two shorties to go and he has me covered.
My decisions are either to four-bet all in or to call and see a flop. Usually I would four-bet jam the shit out of him, but I was a bit scared to bust in fourth place and decided to call and see a flop. He also made a fairly small three-bet so I had a good price on the call!
Now the flop comes down A♦ 9♣ 9♥. He makes his standard continuation bet of around half the pot. I decide to try and keep the pot small in case he has a better ace, while I can still extract value from his bad hands on the turn and river. Sometimes I would raise the flop and call a shove, but as I said I really didn’t want to bust at this stage. The turn comes a 5♥. Now he checks, and I am thinking what to do. I can bet for value, but the problem here is there are not many hands that are calling my bets on the turn. Also I want to give him the opportunity to bluff the river. So I check back and the river is a jack. The board is now reading A-9-9-5-J.
I am hoping he will check, so I can value-bet or that he will bet so I can snap him off. But to my surprise after about 30 seconds he over-bets the pot — not big, but around 1.2x over-bet. I did not like that at all. I know it was not a mistake. He is not that kind of guy to do a “misclick”.
While I would have snap-called any normal amount this set me into the thinking mode. What was he representing? From the value range there are only two hands: A-J and J-J. Because every other hand like A-A, or a 9 or 5-5 (basically hands that beat me on the flop/turn), I would expect him to barrel the turn (he knows I like to call). But are there really that many bluffs in his range either? My check back on the turn suggests weakness, but is he expecting me to fold an ace?
It was a hard decision and I really didn’t like it but in the end I figured his value range is so small and basically consisting of two hand combinations only so I called. He turned over A♣ J♣ and tweeted something about value-towning Russian alcoholics… well played sir!
Kevin Vandersmissen’s thoughts on the hand:
The reason why I three-bet the hand preflop is because A-Js is a monster fourhanded and Vladimir was calling almost every three-bet which means his calling range is huge in this spot so I can easily value three-bet A-J versus him.
So he did what I expected, he called. The flop was OK — A-9-9 I c-bet my normal amount in three-bet pots which is mostly less then half pot. I c-bet there because he never has A-K, not a lot of the time he has A-Q but it’s possible, and he might have some floats in his range.
The turn is a blank, I check for pot control because I don’t want to get raised in this spot as that would put me in a very difficult spot. He checks behind which meant for me he also had a hand with showdown value and that he is checking behind also for pot control.
The river is a J, this doesn’t really change a lot but it’s great if he has the A-Q that he could have in rare spots. The reason why I bet so big on the river is because Vladimir and I had a sick meta-game going on, and I thought he would fold a lot of those showdown hands if I bet a normal amount. He also didn’t like to fold in weird spots versus me, I noticed the previous days. So I decided to start some sort of level war and bet big, first I was thinking about a 1 million+ bet but somehow I betted 860,000. I thought such a big bet would mean two things for him about my hand — A nutted hand or a pure bluff.
It’s also a great spot to bet so big because his hand is kind of played face up and he might think I know that the hand was played face up. So he could think I bet so big because I want to get him off that “face-up played hand”. ♠