In the $1,500 buy-in pot-limit hold'em tournament at the 2006
World Series of Poker (
WSOP), more than 1,100 players began play looking for a coveted gold bracelet and more than $340,000 for first place. Two days later, nine players sat down at the final table, including top pros John Juanda and Can Hua, high-limit player Rick Chase, and "Tilt Boy" Rafe Furst. Juanda was eliminated when his Q-Q lost all in before the flop against Hua's A-K.
With the blinds at $10,000-$20,000, Furst looked down at A-A on the button. He decided to just call the $20,000 bet in order to induce some action. In the old days, a common poker maxim was this: If you slow-play your big pair and lose a big pot, you get what you deserve. This rule seemed set in stone when I first came around the scene in the late 1980s, and for good reason. The top players believed that by slow-playing big pocket pairs, you were giving your opponents "free cards," which they then used to bust you. The rule was so prevalent back then that if I ever lost a huge pot when slow-playing my big pocket pair, even though I was a huge favorite, everyone would say, "You slow-played K-K? You got what you deserved." There was no further discussion needed! Never mind the fact that I was a huge favorite with one card to come when the money went in, or that there may have been a good reason why I slow-played my hand, or that I actually induced the action that I was hoping for; it was simply, "Do not slow-play big pairs; there is no further discussion needed." That was then, and this is now. In my books, DVDs, and new MP4 course "White Belt to Black Belt" at iamplify.com, I discuss why slow-playing big pairs can be a great strategy sometimes.
After Furst smooth-called the $20,000 bet, the player in the small blind called with K-10, and then, from the big blind, Hua decided to raise it $60,000 more with 7-2 offsuit. Now, Furst decided to smooth-call one more time and the small blind folded his K-10. We had a rare matchup, indeed: In fact, we had the worst hand in hold'em (7-2) up against the best hand in hold'em (A-A). The flop came down Q-7-7, Hua bet out $55,000, and Furst smooth-called one more time. Of course, Furst was continuing his "trap" of Hua, not knowing that Hua had already outdrawn him. On the turn, a 3 came off, Hua checked, Furst bet out $53,000, and Hua raised Furst's last $60,000 or so. Furst called instantly, only to find out that he was a 20-to-1 underdog with one card to come; he needed an ace, and there were two aces left in the deck.
But what about the slow-playing going on during this hand, and how did Hua play the hand? First, let's address Hua's play of this hand. I do not mind his raise preflop, trying to steal the $60,000 in the pot. I mean, ideally Hua would recognize somehow that Furst has pocket aces, as great players seem to sense when their opponents have the best possible hand, and then Hua could abandon any thought of making a move before the flop. As for his bet on the flop, I love it. He bet $55,000, which was less than the size of the $60,000 raise he made preflop. Making a bet of this size will induce a call from Furst with any pocket pair he may have started with, and it gives Furst the chance to bluff at the pot. I love the check on the turn, as well. Why not let Furst do the betting for you? You pretty much know you have an unbeatable hand.
I do not mind Furst's preflop smooth-call for $20,000. His smooth-call of Hua's $60,000 raise is more questionable. Furst limped in to induce action, and that he did! But why not raise it back another, say, $80,000 or so, and take that $60,000 raise - that you induced Hua to make - down into your stack (after Hua folds)? I mean, how much money are you trying to win when you limp in with pocket aces? How many free cards will you give your opponent? You have to ask this: Wouldn't that $120,000 pot look good to a guy who had only another $227,000 in chips? If so, reraise and try to win it right there. On the other hand, I don't mind the extreme slow-play too much. By smooth-calling the $60,000 raise, Furst was also inducing a bet or a bluff on the flop from Hua. So, all in all, Furst's $60,000 smooth-call was slightly worse than the reraise.
On the flop, Furst just called the $55,000 bet, and I love this play. What hand could beat him at this point in the hand? Also, there were no draws out there - no flush draw or straight draw to worry about. I also love Furst's $53,000 bet on the turn. By betting so little, he was luring Hua into calling, and the board still made his hand extra strong. As far as his call of Hua's all-in raise is concerned, this was an easy and natural call for Furst to make. Amazingly, the last card was an ace, and Furst went on to win his first
WSOP bracelet.
Now, Furst is in the nice position of trumping his best friend Phil Gordon - who faithfully sweated Furst to victory - with the fact that he has a bracelet and Gordon does not! Of course, Gordon has a
World Poker Tour (
WPT) title, and Furst doesn't.
