Sign Up For Card Player's Newsletter And Free Bi-Monthly Online Magazine

BEST DAILY FANTASY SPORTS BONUSES

Poker Training

Newsletter and Magazine

Sign Up

Find Your Local

Card Room

 

High Stakes Poker

Then, the real fun started

by Phil Hellmuth |  Published: Jul 18, 2007

Print-icon
 
Recently, while filming the next season of High Stakes Poker for the Game Show Network, a weird hand came up between Brian Brandon (a successful businessman "invitee" to the game) and me. With the blinds at $300-$600 and a $100 per man ante, millionaire Brandon opened for $2,400 from early position. In the small blind, I looked down at the 9 9 and pondered my options. It seemed like a call to me, for two reasons. First, I like to merely call with medium pocket pairs to disguise the strength of my hand; and second, I like to merely call (versus reraising) to avoid being reraised. However, I couldn't shake the feeling that I was supposed to reraise this time. My instincts kept telling me that Brandon was very weak. Finally, I went with my gut and reraised, making it $9,000 to go, and Brandon called me.

The flop came Q J 7, I checked, and Brandon bet $16,000. I studied for a moment, with my first thought being that I should fold. After all, Brandon had called a reraise, and I couldn't beat very many "real hands." But, again, I had a strong feeling that Brandon was weak. I called, the turn was the 4, and we both checked. On the river, the 7 came off, and I bet out $2,500, saying, "I guess that you don't have too much."

Brandon said, "I'll just call and let you off cheap, because you may have me beat. But I think I win this pot." Brandon then flipped up the 7 6 and claimed the pot with three sevens. At that point, I went a little crazy, and I'm sure that it made for some pretty good television. I really do wish that I could control myself better in these situations, but, on the other hand, they tell me that my tantrums do make for excellent television!

Here is what the Poker Brat … uh … what I said: "I cannot believe that this guy called a $6,600 reraise with 7-6 offsuit! Are they just trying to give their money to me, or what? And how poorly did Brian play this pot? I mean, we put in $25,000 apiece when I had him dominated, then $2,500 apiece when he hit his miracle seven! These businessmen play so poorly that they cannot win!" Then I said to Mike "The Mouth" Matusow, "What a beat that was for $50,000!"

Then, the real fun started.

First, Matusow said, "Stop whining; there wasn't very much money in that pot."

I replied, "What are you talking about? We put in $25,000 each, at least!"

Matusow then said, "Are you crazy? That pot was small."

Then Matusow bet me $10,000 that there was less than $52,000 in the pot. I accepted that bet, but began to wonder if my math was off.

Just then, Phil Laak said, "I'll lay $30,000 to $10,000 that there was less than $52,000 in that pot."

Was I going nuts? I could remember $25,000 each plus the antes, but was there $52,000 in the pot? Since I could remember $50,000, I bet Matusow another $5,000 that there was more than $50,000 in the pot, and he accepted the bet. Of course, as those of you counting at home know, the pot actually had more than $56,000 in it ($9,000 + $9,000 + $800 antes + $600 big blind + $16,000 + $16,000 + $2,500 + $2,500 = $56,400). If only I could have remembered the $2,500 bet on the end, I could have won another $30,000 from Laak. Still, Matusow's $15,000 was sweet, especially considering that he told me that I didn't "have the right to whine because the pot was so small."

Now, let's take a closer look at this hand. Brandon's upfront raise with 7-6 offsuit was a bit suspect, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, as he had been playing pretty patiently before then. I made an excellent reraise with my 9-9, sensing Brandon's weakness. His call of my reraise was superweak. Why get involved with 7-6 offsuit against me? On the other hand, he did have position on me, and we both had deep stacks of more than $150,000 apiece. Because we were both deep, his call here is not that bad, because if he does hit his hand, he can potentially make $150,000 in profit on the hand. I like my check on the flop. His bet on the flop was not bad, really. I could have had A-K, A-10, or a pocket pair lower than jacks. So, his bet gives him the chance to bluff me out, or charge me to draw a card to A-K or A-10. I like my call on the flop, but could I have raised and won the pot right then and there? That question haunted me a bit that night. I like my check on the turn, as well, but could I have made a big bet and won the pot? His check on the turn was a good one. My $2,500 bet on the river was an excellent one. It forced Brandon to pay me off if he did have a pair lower than mine, like 6-6, or if he had A-K, or even A-10. The bet also served a defensive purpose: It froze Brandon! I hate his call on the end. Why not raise when you hit your miracle 7? I may have called a $10,000 or even a $15,000 raise.