The Poker Hall Of Fame Is Still BrokenPoker’s Most Exclusive Club Is Way Too Exclusiveby Julio Rodriguez | Published: Aug 21, 2024 |
|
Editor’s Note: This column originally appeared in July of 2023, but since no changes were made to the Poker Hall of Fame in the last year, it remains relevant and is being re-run with the appropriate edits.
There’s no doubting Patrik Antonius’ worthiness for the Poker Hall of Fame. The 43-year-old has a stellar poker résumé that boasts millions in high rollers wins and extended time in some of the biggest cash games in the world. By all accounts, the Finnish pro was a slam dunk choice for nomination, described by WSOP Executive Director Ty Stewart as “a force both online and live.”
Antonius becomes the 63rd overall member, and will be able to cast a vote next year along with the 31 other living members of the Hall.
Still, it’s hard not to feel for the deserving players left on the outside looking in, and that’s a list that is far longer than just the nine other nominees who came up just short this year.
Antonius beat out Mike Matusow, Matt Savage, Ted Forrest, ‘Miami’ John Cernuto, Isai Scheinberg, Bill Smith, Barny Boatman, Josh Arieh, and Kathy Liebert for induction this year. All of them have Hall-worthy achievements, but yet their chances at getting in grow slimmer each year as the logjam of eligible players ages into consideration and bottlenecks with a one-player-per-year restriction.
Matusow has now been nominated 10 different times, with Savage sitting on nine. Forrest has been up for induction seven times. There are many issues facing the institution, but the biggest remains the Hall’s exclusivity.
1. One Player Per Year Is Not Enough
I doubt I’ll get many who disagree with me here, except for maybe those already in. There are now 63 members of the Poker Hall of Fame (full list below), but arguably just as many players who meet, or will soon meet the criteria for induction. In fact, in the next five years there will be a large number of high-stakes crushers who will turn 40, putting my personal current count of Hall-worthy players at more than 80. (Yes, I made a list. No, I won’t publish it.)
It wasn’t always this way, of course. The Poker Hall of Fame began with an inaugural class of seven members, and although there was only one inductee per year for quite some time after that, the poker world was also quite small back then. In 2002, two players were inducted at the same time, and double inductees continued in the boom years from 2005 to 2019. But instead of doubling the number to four, as many wanted, the Hall instead went back to one per year.
The solution is obvious and simple… more inductees. How many? I believe three to four players per year would be a good number, with an additional inductee every year for those who fall into the category of industry contributors and influencers. (Perhaps even writers!)
The actual number can be debated, but it just HAS to be more than one. The poker world has grown exponentially since the Hall was started back in 1979.
2. The Hall Needs A Physical Home
The World Series of Poker operates the Poker Hall of Fame and has been run by Caesars Entertainment since their purchase of the series back in 2004. They’ve since launched a special Hall of Fame event at the WSOP that features a $1,979 buy-in and bounties on all Hall members who play, and rebranded the Horseshoe card room as the Hall of Fame Poker Room, complete with player photos and some limited memorabilia.
Las Vegas is home to many interesting places and has museums honoring the history of everything from punk rock to pinball, even the mob, but poker’s Hall doesn’t really have its own physical space to call its own. And that’s surprising given the amount of actual space that Caesars has at its disposal at the Paris and Horseshoe on the Strip.
Each summer, the WSOP should dedicate a small section of the convention area to the Poker Hall of Fame and its members. Existing Hall members could loan out memorabilia whether its photos and bracelets or other trophies and items from the past that could rotate on display for visitors. Caesars could even tie it into their gift shop and sell t-shirts if they need to justify the square footage. (Will people buy a hoodie with Hellmuth’s face on it?)
3. Most Voters Are Clueless
With all due respect to the public (and to the readers of Card Player), the public should have little to no say in who gets into the Poker Hall of Fame. The WSOP found this out the hard way in 2009 when they asked fans to vote on nominees and a then 22-year-old Tom Dwan was the overwhelming choice.
Today, the public gets some input with an online nomination period, but it’s minimal. According to the WSOP website, the Poker Hall of Fame Governing Council gets the final say on who makes the list.
The final vote goes to the living members of the Hall, of which there are now only 32. While all of them are legends in the poker world, not all of them are as plugged into the game as they once were, and as a result, many of the post-boom players have been ignored.
There used to be an additional voting block of media members, Card Player included, but it was eliminated once the Hall went back to one inductee per year. In my biased opinion, this was a mistake. Almost every other sports hall of fame asks their industry journalists for help in the nomination and voting process, most notably the Baseball Writers Association of America, which votes annually on the Baseball Hall of Fame.
As far as I’m concerned, the more knowledgeable voters, the better. With only 32 voters, some of whom are more influential than others, there is a natural tendency for lobbying, if not outright collusion. (I won’t repeat unsubstantiated rumors, but there have been murmurs of players pushed in by friendly votes over the years.)
When a small group of friends determines who gets into the Hall every year, the Hall ends up lacking in diversity. Even if you forget the fact that the Hall only has three female members, there’s also a glaring lack of international players even though the game has grown by leaps and bounds all over the world. (Although the Hall grew a little more diverse with its first Finnish inductee.)
4. Timing Plays Too Big A Role On Who Gets In
An age requirement was a good idea on paper, and it solved the Tom Dwan problem from 2009, but it also creates an unfortunate bias of timing when it comes to who gets selected. Since a player must be 40, naturally, all eyes go to those who are in their early 40’s. There are dozens of candidates in their 50s, 60s, and 70s to choose from, but they have largely been forgotten to history.
Keep in mind that a player who is 40 has been playing poker for only two decades, give or take when they started. While that is a long career in sports, it’s nowhere near the finish line in poker. Do we not give credit to those who have built an entire lifetime for themselves in the game? Conversely, do we punish those who started out strong as crushers, but who ultimately aged out of the high-stakes games before they could get recognized for their accomplishments?
What about those who just take their foot off the gas pedal? We’ve had a number of high rollers over the last decade become so successful that they decided to retire early or only play part time. Will they be penalized for winning too much, too soon?
Rast showed incredible timing last summer, winning his third PPC title just days after the voting opened, but timing also factors in other ways. Layne Flack and David ‘Devilfish’ Ulliott are obviously worthy of the Hall, but had they not passed away, they’d likely still be waiting for their turn.
The rules already state that a player must “stand the test of time” to be inducted, so there’s really no reason for an age requirement. What constitutes “standing the test of time?” That’s up to the individual voter.
If someone has put together a Hall of Fame career by the age of 35, (Fedor Holz is only 30!) then they should be considered. On the other hand, if someone qualifies at age 70 because of sheer longevity, then they shouldn’t be disregarded, either. ♠
Here’s a look at the complete Hall of Fame.
Name | Inducted |
Johnny Moss | 1979 |
Nick “The Greek” Dandolos | 1979 |
Felton “Corky” McCorquodale | 1979 |
Red Winn | 1979 |
Sid Wyman | 1979 |
James Butler “Wild Bill” Hickok | 1979 |
Edmond Hoyle | 1979 |
Blondie Forbes | 1980 |
Bill Boyd | 1981 |
Tom Abdo | 1982 |
Joe Bernstein | 1983 |
Murph Harrold | 1984 |
Red Hodges | 1985 |
Henry Green | 1986 |
Walter Clyde “Puggy” Pearson | 1987 |
Doyle “Texas Dolly” Brunson | 1988 |
Jack “Treetop” Straus | 1988 |
Fred “Sarge” Ferris | 1989 |
Benny Binion | 1990 |
David “Chip” Reese | 1991 |
Thomas “Amarillo Slim” Preston | 1992 |
Jack Keller | 1993 |
Julius Oral Popwell | 1996 |
Roger Moore | 1997 |
Stu “The Kid” Ungar | 2001 |
Lyle Berman | 2002 |
Johnny “The Orient Express” Chan | 2002 |
Bobby “The Owl” Baldwin | 2003 |
Berry Johnston | 2004 |
Jack Binion | 2005 |
Crandell Addington | 2005 |
T.J. Cloutier | 2006 |
Billy Baxter | 2006 |
Barbara Enright | 2007 |
Phil Hellmuth | 2007 |
Dewey Tomko | 2008 |
Henry Orenstein | 2008 |
Mike Sexton | 2009 |
Dan Harrington | 2010 |
Erik Seidel | 2010 |
Linda Johnson | 2011 |
Barry Greenstein | 2011 |
Eric Drache | 2012 |
Bryan “Sailor” Roberts | 2012 |
Scotty Nguyen | 2013 |
Tom McEvoy | 2013 |
Daniel Negreanu | 2014 |
Jack McClelland | 2014 |
Jennifer Harman | 2015 |
John Juanda | 2015 |
Carlos Mortensen | 2016 |
Todd Brunson | 2016 |
David “Devilfish” Ulliott | 2017 |
Phil Ivey | 2017 |
John Hennigan | 2018 |
Mori Eskandani | 2018 |
Chris Moneymaker | 2019 |
David Oppenheim | 2019 |
Huck Seed | 2020 |
Eli Elezra | 2021 |
Layne Flack | 2022 |
Brian Rast | 2023 |
Patrik Antonius | 2024 |
*Photos by WSOP
Julio Rodriguez is the Associate Publisher and Editorial Director for Card Player Media, having started with the company as a live tournament reporter at the 2006 WSOP. Originally from Miami, Florida, he now lives in Las Vegas with his wife and daughter.
Features
Tournaments
Strategy
Commentary & Analysis