Poker Strategy – EPT London Champion Aaron GustavsonGustavson Talks About Two Key Hands With Peter Eastgate Where He Check-Raised the River |
|
Aaron “aguskb” Gustavson came into the final table of the 2009 EPT London main event with a sizeable chip lead and hung on to take the title, along with £850,000 and a seat to the EPT Championship in Monte Carlo.
However, the wire-to-wire victory was anything but easy, and Gustavson had to hold off several opponents along the way, most notably reigning WSOP main event winner Peter Eastgate.
A the final table, Gustavson and Eastgate squared off twice in pivotal hands that saw the momentum switch. On both of those occasions, Gustavson fired in a river check-raise. The first time he was unsuccessful, but the second time gave him an insurmountable advantage and everything he needed for the win.
In this interview, Gustavson takes us through both hands and explains his thought process.
Hand No. 1 –- That Should Have Worked…
| Event – Blinds/Antes | EPT London | 40,000-80,000 with a 5,000 ante |
| Player | Aaron Gustavson | Peter Eastgate |
| Chip Count | 6.7 million | 3.8 million |
| Hand | 6-5 | 8-8 |
Peter Eastgate raised to 190,000 from early position, and Aaron Gustavson made the call in the big blind. The flop came out A
7
3, and both players checked.
The turn was the 6, and Gustavson checked once again. Eastgate fired out 200,000, and Gustavson called. The river was the 8.
Gustavson checked, and Eastgate thought it over for a bit before betting 400,000. Gustavson took his time and then pushed a stack of 1 million over the line.
Eastgate took his time before making the call and showing pocket eights for a rivered set. Gustavson mucked his hand, but later confessed to holding 6-5 for a turned pair and busted straight draw.
The Analysis
The flop gave me a gutshot, and it went check, check. I paired on the turn and check-called, planning to take it away on the river depending on what came. When the 8 hit the river, I thought it was the perfect card, considering it was a heart. I could represent, and it didn’t look like it hit his range too hard. Little did I know, he hit his set.
I was a bit unlucky in that regard. I think almost any other river card I can get him to lay his hand down. Unless, of course, he decides to check it back, but I think he would fire again on the river most times, even if he didn’t spike the 8.
Not to mention that he doesn’t always have to have a hand there, and my pair of sixes has some showdown value when he checks behind.
Hand No. 2 -– Letting Him Fire One More Time
| Event – Blinds/Antes | EPT London | 80,000-160,000 with a 20,000 ante |
| Player | Aaron Gustavson | Peter Eastgate |
| Chip Count | 14.1 million | 7.9 million |
| Hand | A-5 | K-X |
Peter Eastgate raised on the button, and Aaron Gustavson called in the big blind. The flop came down Q 5
2, and Eastgate continued with a bet of 370,000.
Gustavson called, and the turn was the K. Eastgate bet 725,000, and Gustavson once again made the call.
The river was the 5, and Gustavson checked. Eastgate fired in a bet of 1,135,000, and Gustavson tanked for a bit. When he made his decision, he raised to 3,300,000. Eastgate agonized over the decision for quite some time with nearly a third of his stack in the pot.
Finally, he let it go, conceding the pot and big chip advantage to Gustavson.
The Analysis
Eastgate was definitely my strongest competition at the table, and it didn’t help that he was sitting on my left the entire time. I didn’t expect heads-up play to go so quickly, but I knew that we were both more than capable of getting it in light against each other, considering how aggressive we are.
I had A-5. He’s very aggressive and willing to bluff a good amount. My plan going into it was to check-call a lot, keep the pots small, and let him do the betting for me. To be honest, my pair of fives is probably good there most of the time, even without making trips. I mean, he said he had a king, and I believe him, but it’s not a hand that’s going to show up all that often.
If it was a blank and he bet, I would’ve been in a tough spot to make the call. I think that leading the river gives away my hand, so I thought I’d let him take another stab at the pot. Check-raising definitely looks bluffier, and given our history with that first hand we played, I thought there was a good chance he’d pay me off this time. Instead, he made a good laydown. Fortunately, the pot was big enough to give me a big chip advantage.
Copyright © 2001-2024
CardPlayer.com. All rights reserved.
